top of page

The Story of
Legal Process Automation
Smart Legal Contracts

Legal contracts are the basic framework for modern society. They enable all commerce and finance. A nation’s constitution is a contract with its citizens.


The world has digitalised, but despite their importance, legal contracts have not. They remain analogue records of obligations and participants are left on their own to figure out how to fulfill them. Most often, the solution is a large amount of manual tasks. These create cost, risk and the likelihood of error. The World Commerce and Contracting Association estimates that the average company fails to capture nearly 10% of the value of their legal contracts. At a global level, this represents $2.5T of unrealized GDP.

Digital platforms are helping, but not changing, the analogue agreement

Even if these core problems remain, legal contracting is steadily improving. Sophisticated software helps analogue contracts be drafted, reviewed, negotiated and signed. These systems can also take information from analogue contracts and push it into a company’s business systems, such as ERP, CRM, payment, billing and client support platforms.


These capabilities help, but do not change, the analogue nature of the legal contract.

Contract management systems typically require significant investment, limiting their use to large enterprises, and only serve to improve the internal performance of one party. A very different approach may be used by their counterparty, who may simply have Post-it notes stuck to a computer monitor. Value generated by a legal relationship depends on how well both parties perform it and complex contract management systems are regularly undermined by counterparties that perform their obligations manually and inaccurately. After all, the number one system for managing legal documents is still the email inbox.

Unilateral contract management systems have the wrong goal 

Contract management is holding back a golden age of commerce

Despite being seen as helpful, these contract management systems are actually holding back global commerce by providing a crutch for the analogue agreement to lean on, delaying a transformation that promises a golden age of business and finance. They function like life support for an ill patient, but do not cure the disease.

Its time to stop asking how to make contracts ‘less bad’. They can and should be a vital tool in creating and capturing business value.

Legal Process Automation uses Smart Legal Contracts to create a new set of rails for global commerce

Legal Process Automation is the practice of embedding business automation directly within the contract and making it part of the overall binding agreement signed between parties. It represents a new class of both legal agreements and business automation. Legal Process Automation is different as it is bi-lateral, working on behalf of the legal contract and not a particular party’s business systems. It is also indelible and legally certain. Once an agreement is signed, it takes actions, assures outcomes, and creates records until it has come to term, the parties have agreed to amend or terminate, or a court has ordered its suspension. The new class of agreements that use LPA are known as Smart Legal Contracts.


LPA represents a new set of rails for global business. It assures that legal relationships are functioning as their participants intend and frees them to focus on delivering the core value of a business. They enhance trust, enable fast and accurate business, and remove the friction that limits commerce or transactions.

LPA creates active legal agreements 

Legal Process Automation:

  • Controls payments: Calculate how much is due for payment and receive, process or send those payments

  • Handles subjective decisions: Ask individuals such shareholders for the decisions that direct the legal agreement’s subsequent actions

  • Organises processes and communication: Remind, receive and relay important documents or notices required in an agreement

  • Connects to external data: Connect to external sources, like key interest rates or registries, to trigger next steps or take follow-up action

  • Eliminates the operational penalty of bespoke terms: LPA enabled legal agreements work equally well whether its 10,000 copies of an agreement or just 1

  • Creates an indelible, single source of truth: Immutable records create transparency about the state of a legal relationship and collect all records related to a specific agreement in one place, replacing fragmented or ad hoc archives

LPA's goal is to enable  business model innovation

Individually, LPA’s capabilities add value to any organisation where business success is tied to the performance of legal obligations. When these benefits are combined, LPA enables innovation within existing business models and unlocks entirely new ones that are simply not viable using today’s analogue legal architecture.

Legal Process Automation based on Smart Legal Contracts:

  • Shared Perspective: SLCs are designed to be shared between parties, allowing all involved to have the same view and understanding of the contract and its state.

  • Trust: As the contract is shared and its clauses self-executing, it fosters trust between the parties. Both sides can be confident that the contract will be executed as agreed, reducing the potential for disputes.

  • Mutual Execution: All parties can monitor and validate the execution of clauses in real-time. This collaborative aspect ensures transparency and joint decision-making.


Contract management (CM) tools:

  • Single Party Control: CM tools are generally used by one party to manage its contracts, and the system's view and data might not be shared with the other contracting party.

  • Focus on Management: The primary goal of CM tools is to streamline the management of contracts for the organization that owns the tool, without necessarily involving the other party in the process.

  • Potential for Discrepancies: As CM tools are unilateral, there could be discrepancies between how one party perceives the contract and its obligations versus the other party.

The bilateral nature of SLC-based LPA promotes transparency, trust, and collaboration between contracting parties. In contrast, CM tools are primarily designed for the administrative and managerial needs of a single party.

CM tools are about the management of analogue contracts throughout their lifecycle. LPA is about making contracts active and responsive.

What does Legal Process Automation replace and why is it better?

bottom of page